B.No<\/a>. 12351\/86, 22\/04\/1992)<\/p>\n\n\n\nBu yasal d\u00fczenlemeler ve a\u00e7\u0131klamalar do\u011frultusunda;<\/p>\n\n\n\n
1- Bir\u00e7ok san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, tan\u0131klar\u0131n dinlendi\u011fi oturumlardan (16 oturum veya esas hakk\u0131ndaki m\u00fctalaaya kadar gibi) \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan tan\u0131klara soru sorma ve tan\u0131k ifadelerine kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunma olana\u011f\u0131 tan\u0131nmayarak,<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Disiplin cezas\u0131 veya duru\u015fman\u0131n y\u00f6netimi kapsam\u0131nda oturumlardan uzakla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lan san\u0131klar\u0131n veya m\u00fcdafilerinin oturuma kat\u0131l\u0131mlar\u0131ndan sonra kendilerine, yokluklar\u0131nda yap\u0131lan i\u015flem ve al\u0131nan ifadelerinin okunmayarak (\u00f6rne\u011fin tan\u0131k \u2026\u2026.\u2019in beyan\u0131 al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 oturumdan \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131lan san\u0131klar ve m\u00fcdafilerine okunmamas\u0131 gibi uygulamalar\u0131yla) CMK\u2019n\u0131n 204. maddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve bu suretle savunma haklar\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131s\u0131tlanmas\u0131;<\/p>\n\n\n\n
2- Dosyan\u0131n kapsam\u0131 da dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda CMK\u2019n\u0131n 181\/1. maddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak genellikle tan\u0131klar\u0131n dinlenece\u011fi oturumlar\u0131n bir takvime ba\u011flay\u0131p haz\u0131rl\u0131k yapmalar\u0131na olanak verecek \u015fekilde san\u0131klara ve m\u00fcdafilerine bildirilmemesi;<\/p>\n\n\n\n
3- \u2026..\u2019\u0131n ifadelerinin san\u0131k, tan\u0131k ve gizli tan\u0131k olarak tespit edilip daha sonra bu beyanlar\u0131n ayn\u0131 maddi olayla ilgili olarak birbirini destekler nitelikte \u00fc\u00e7 ayr\u0131 kan\u0131t olarak h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nmas\u0131;<\/p>\n\n\n\n
4- Tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00fcvenilirli\u011finin denetlenmesi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan anlat\u0131mlarda ge\u00e7en tarihi bilgi ve maddi vak\u0131alar\u0131n uygunlu\u011funun ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p tespitinden sonra h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekirken tan\u0131klar\u0131n, san\u0131klar\u0131n aleyhine \u015fahsi yorumlar yapmas\u0131na m\u00fcsaade edilerek ve bu y\u00f6ndeki bir k\u0131s\u0131m san\u0131klar\u0131n itirazlar\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nmaks\u0131z\u0131n hayat\u0131n ola\u011fan ak\u0131\u015f\u0131yla uygun d\u00fc\u015fmeyen tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nmas\u0131;<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Bu ba\u011flamda, tan\u0131k \u2026..\u2019in dosyadaki orijinal belgeye ayk\u0131r\u0131 yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131 giri\u015f \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f bilgilerine uymayan beyanlar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131, bu belgeler getirilip tan\u0131\u011fa sorulmamas\u0131 ve beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n do\u011frulu\u011funun denetlenmemesi, gizli tan\u0131k K\u0131ska\u00e7 ve gizli tan\u0131k 9\u2019un beyanlar\u0131ndaki \u00f6znel yorumlar\u0131 ve san\u0131klardan birinin eski e\u015finin yeni kocas\u0131 olan gizli tan\u0131k \u2026.\u2019\u0131n san\u0131\u011fa olan husumetinin bulunmas\u0131 hususlar\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda tan\u0131klar\u0131n tarafs\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ne \u015fekilde sa\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ve neden ifadesine itibar edildi\u011finin karar yerinde a\u00e7\u0131klanmamas\u0131;<\/p>\n\n\n\n
5-Gizli tan\u0131klar 9 ve \u2026. gibi baz\u0131 tan\u0131klar\u0131n ifadelerinin tespiti s\u0131ras\u0131nda san\u0131klar hakaret i\u00e7eren s\u00f6zler sarf ederek duru\u015fma disiplinine ayk\u0131r\u0131 davrand\u0131klar\u0131 halde tan\u0131klar hakk\u0131nda disiplin tedbiri uygulanmas\u0131 yerine tepki g\u00f6steren san\u0131klar hakk\u0131nda oturumdan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmalar\u0131na veya uzun s\u00fcreli oturumlardan yasaklanmalar\u0131na karar verilerek savunma haklar\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131s\u0131tlanmas\u0131;<\/p>\n\n\n\n
6-Gizli tan\u0131k 9\u2019un 14.11.2012 tarihli oturumda ifadesi tespit edilirken,\u2026 sald\u0131r\u0131s\u0131 soru\u015fturmas\u0131n\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fcten \u2026.. Cumhuriyet savc\u0131lar\u0131, yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 yapan mahkeme ba\u015fkan\u0131, \u2026 onursal ba\u015fsavc\u0131s\u0131 ile bir k\u0131s\u0131m siyaset\u00e7i ve kamu g\u00f6revlileri hakk\u0131nda iftira ve a\u011f\u0131r hakaret i\u00e7eren ve maddi ger\u00e7eklere uygun d\u00fc\u015fmeyen s\u00f6zler sarf etmesi \u00fczerine, haz\u0131r bulunan san\u0131k ve m\u00fcdafilerinin anlat\u0131m\u0131n devam etmemesi y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki itirazlar\u0131 reddedilerek, tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n benzer \u015fekilde anlat\u0131mlar\u0131na devam etmesine m\u00fcsaade edilerek tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n dinlenmesine ili\u015fkin usul kurallar\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131lmas\u0131;<\/p>\n\n\n\n
7-Gizli tan\u0131k 9 gibi baz\u0131 tan\u0131klar\u0131n ifade vermeleri s\u0131ras\u0131nda tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n sadece bildiklerini ve g\u00f6rd\u00fcklerini anlatma prensibine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak ellerinde bulunan dok\u00fcmanlar\u0131 inceleyerek anlat\u0131mda bulunmas\u0131na ve sorular\u0131 yan\u0131tlamas\u0131na m\u00fcsaade edilerek CMK\u2019n\u0131n 59\/1. maddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131lmas\u0131;<\/p>\n\n\n\n
8-Gizli tan\u0131k \u2026. gibi bir k\u0131s\u0131m tan\u0131klar\u0131n beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7eli karara aynen yaz\u0131larak olumlu ya da olumsuz de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmadan h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nmas\u0131;<\/p>\n\n\n\n
9-Bir delilden mahkemenin hangi gerek\u00e7e ile vazge\u00e7ebilece\u011fi ya da ortaya konulmas\u0131 isteminin hangi nedenlerle reddedilece\u011fi CMK\u2019n\u0131n 206\/2. maddesinde a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Maddenin 2\/b f\u0131kras\u0131nda \u201cdelil ile ispatlanmak istenilen olay\u0131n karara etkisi yoksa\u201d ortaya konulmak istenilen delilin ve bu kapsamda tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n dinlenmesi talebi de mahkemece reddolunabilir. CMK\u2019n\u0131n 172. maddesinde san\u0131\u011fa ve kat\u0131lanlara s\u00f6ylenen tan\u0131k dinletme hakk\u0131 s\u0131n\u0131rs\u0131z de\u011fildir. Davaya konu olayla ilgili olarak karara etkisi olma ihtimali bulunmas\u0131 halinde mahkemenin tan\u0131k dinlemesi mecburi hale getirilmektedir. Taraflar\u0131n CMK\u2019n\u0131n 178. maddesine g\u00f6re haz\u0131r etti\u011fi ya da yarg\u0131laman\u0131n seyrine g\u00f6re dinlenmesini gerekli g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc tan\u0131klar\u0131n dinlenmelerine ili\u015fkin talep ve haklar\u0131n\u0131n ancak CMK\u2019n\u0131n 206\/2 maddesinde say\u0131lan nedenle s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131labilece\u011finin kabul\u00fc gerekir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Bununla birlikte delillerin ortaya konmas\u0131 \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde tan\u0131k dinleme talebinin reddi i\u00e7in ciddi ve a\u00e7\u0131k bir nedenin bulunmas\u0131, CMK\u2019n\u0131n 206\/2 maddesi uyar\u0131nca verilecek karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinin somut olgu ve olaylara ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak ortaya konulmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Nitekim yerle\u015fik Ceza Genel Kurulu kararlar\u0131nda belirtildi\u011fi gibi mahkemenin t\u00fcm kararlar\u0131n\u0131n Anayasan\u0131n 141\/3 ve CMK\u2019n\u0131n 34. maddesine g\u00f6re akla, hukuka ve maddi olaya uygun bir a\u00e7\u0131klama i\u00e7eren gerek\u00e7eye sahip olmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Yerel mahkeme 11.01.2013 tarihli karar\u0131nda, dinlenen toplam a\u00e7\u0131k ve gizli tan\u0131k say\u0131s\u0131n\u0131, bunlar\u0131n %37.7\u2019sinin san\u0131klar ve m\u00fcdafilerinin talebi ile dinlendi\u011fini belirttikten sonra, tan\u0131k dinletme isteklerinin do\u011frudan reddedilmeyip yap\u0131lan de\u011ferlendirme sonucunda talebin \u00f6nemli bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131, kar\u015f\u0131lamayanlar\u0131n ise \u201cdavaya katk\u0131 sa\u011flamayaca\u011f\u0131, gayri ciddi olmalar\u0131, davan\u0131n uzamas\u0131na sebep olmas\u0131 ve dinlenen tan\u0131klar\u0131n niteli\u011fi ve niceli\u011fi itibariyle maddi ger\u00e7e\u011fi vuzuha kavu\u015fturmaya yeterli oldu\u011fu bu nedenle dinlenmelerinin davaya katk\u0131 sa\u011flamayaca\u011f\u0131, aksine davan\u0131n y\u0131llarca uzamas\u0131na sebep olaca\u011f\u0131, adil yarg\u0131lama ilkesinin bir unsuru olan \u2018davan\u0131n makul s\u00fcrede bitirilmesi\u2019ni a\u00e7\u0131k bir \u015fekilde \u00f6nleyece\u011fi\u201d gerek\u00e7esiyle dinlenen tan\u0131klarla yetinilmesine, ba\u015fkaca tan\u0131k dinlenmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. Mahkemenin gerek\u00e7esinde belirtti\u011fi istatistiksel bilgiler tan\u0131k dinlenmesinin gerek\u00e7esi olamayaca\u011f\u0131 gibi davay\u0131 uzatmak ama\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ve gayri ciddiliklerini ortaya koyan maddi olaylara ili\u015fkin somut olgular belirtilmeden, kanun metnin tekrar\u0131ndan ibaret c\u00fcmlelere yer vermenin, gerek\u00e7eyi hukuka uygun hale getirmeyece\u011fi gibi, savunma taraf\u0131ndan dinlenilmesi talep edilen tan\u0131klar\u0131n bir\u00e7o\u011funun yarg\u0131lama konusu olaya ili\u015fkin ilgi ve g\u00f6rg\u00fcleri olan ki\u015filer olup, bu tan\u0131klar\u0131n davaya katk\u0131 sa\u011flamayaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin tespitin de dosya i\u00e7eri\u011fine uygun d\u00fc\u015fmedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Gerek\u00e7e olarak g\u00f6sterilen \u201cdavan\u0131n makul s\u00fcrede bitirilmesi\u201d ilkesi, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n lehine konulmu\u015f bir adil yarg\u0131lama prensibi olup; bu prensip, ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131n\u0131n amac\u0131 olan maddi ger\u00e7e\u011fin ortaya \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131 ve A\u0130HS\u2019nin savunmaya sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 en temel haklardan olan \u201ct\u00fcm \u00f6nemli olgu ve hukuksal sorunlar\u0131 yeterli bi\u00e7imde a\u00e7\u0131klayabilme ve bu konuda delil ileri s\u00fcrebilme\u201d, \u201ckararlar\u0131n gerek\u00e7eli olmas\u0131\u201d, \u201csilahlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi\u201d kurallar\u0131n\u0131 ortadan kald\u0131ramaz. Ancak \u201cger\u00e7ek adalet\u201d makul s\u00fcrede sa\u011flanmal\u0131d\u0131r, ger\u00e7ek adaleti sa\u011flamayan ancak makul s\u00fcrede tamamlanan bir yarg\u0131lama gerek kanunlar\u0131n gerekse A\u0130HS\u2019nin 6. maddesinin bir amac\u0131 olamaz. Kald\u0131 ki makul s\u00fcrenin de\u011ferlendirilmesinde, \u201colay\u0131n kapsam\u0131 ve g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fckleri\u201d, \u201cyarg\u0131lamay\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fcten makam ve yarg\u0131 organ\u0131n\u0131n tutumu\u201d, \u201cyarg\u0131lananlar a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan yarg\u0131laman\u0131n sona ermesinin \u00f6nemi\u201d gibi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fctler g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurulmaktad\u0131r. Bu ba\u011flamda,<\/p>\n\n\n\n
a- Tan\u0131k \u2026\u2026\u2019\u0131n dinlenmesi y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki ara karardan yeterli ve hukuki gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterilmeden vazge\u00e7ilmesi;<\/p>\n\n\n\n
b- Dinlenilmesi halinde dosyan\u0131n esas\u0131n\u0131 etkileyebilecek konumda olup da san\u0131k \u2026 ve m\u00fcdafiinin haz\u0131r ettikleri tan\u0131k \u2026\u2019n\u0131n, san\u0131klar \u2026 ve \u2026..m\u00fcdafiinin haz\u0131r etti\u011fi tan\u0131klar \u2026.Ba\u015fkan\u0131 \u2026, emekli \u2026., emekli \u2026 ve emekli \u2026.., san\u0131k \u2026m\u00fcdafiinin haz\u0131r etti\u011fi tan\u0131k Ya\u015far Yaz\u0131c\u0131o\u011flu\u2019nu, san\u0131k \u2026 m\u00fcdafiinin haz\u0131r etti\u011fi uzman ki\u015fi \u2026.\u2019\u0131 dinletme taleplerinin reddedilmesi;<\/p>\n\n\n\n
c- Tan\u0131k \u2026.\u2019in ifadesinde ge\u00e7en gazete n\u00fcshas\u0131n\u0131n yay\u0131nlan\u0131p yay\u0131nlanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, 2003 y\u0131l\u0131nda san\u0131k \u2026.\u2019\u00fcn \u2026\u2019ya gidip gitmedi\u011fine y\u00f6nelik hususlar ile gizli tan\u0131k \u2026.\u2019\u0131n 22.04.2007\u2019de \u2026\u2019da toplant\u0131 yapt\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylemesine ra\u011fmen \u2026.\u2019\u00fcn koruma kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bu gibi hususlar\u0131n karar yerinde tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmamas\u0131;<\/p>\n\n\n\n
10- Kovu\u015fturma ba\u015f\u0131nda her san\u0131\u011f\u0131n dinlenen tan\u0131klara soru sorulmas\u0131na imkan verilmesine ra\u011fmen 2012 y\u0131l\u0131 Haziran ay\u0131ndan sonra dinlenen tan\u0131klar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ise sadece tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n ifadesinde ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en san\u0131klara s\u00f6zl\u00fc olarak soru sormalar\u0131na di\u011fer san\u0131klar\u0131n ise sorular\u0131n\u0131 yaz\u0131l\u0131 olarak Mahkeme Ba\u015fkan\u0131na iletmelerine ve Mahkeme Ba\u015fkan\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan uygun g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc takdirde sorulmas\u0131na \u015feklinde karar verilerek, san\u0131k veya m\u00fcdafiinin soru sorulmas\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda olayla ilgisi yerine tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n beyan\u0131nda ad\u0131 ge\u00e7mesi gibi yasal olmayan gerek\u00e7elerle engellenmesi, bu ba\u011flamda,<\/p>\n\n\n\n
a)Tan\u0131k \u2026..\u2019\u0131n dinlenmesi s\u0131ras\u0131nda sorular\u0131n yaz\u0131l\u0131 verilmesinin istenmesi;<\/p>\n\n\n\n
b)19.04.2012 tarihli oturumda san\u0131k\u2026.\u2019in kendisi ile ilgili beyanda bulunan gizli tan\u0131\u011fa soru sormak istemesi \u00fczerine m\u00fcsaade edilmemesi, \u0131srar\u0131 \u00fczerine san\u0131\u011f\u0131n oturumdan \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131larak tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n sorgulanmas\u0131na devam edilmesi, gibi uygulamalarla san\u0131klar\u0131n savunma hakk\u0131 k\u0131s\u0131tlanarak adil yarg\u0131lama haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilmesi;<\/p>\n\n\n\n
11-Tan\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131yla soru\u015fturma ve kovu\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda ifadesi tespit edilmedi\u011fi gibi, bir k\u0131s\u0131m beyan\u0131n da zora dayal\u0131 olup yasak delil niteli\u011finde bulundu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen \u2026. isimli ki\u015finin ifade g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerinin duru\u015fmada izlettirilmesi ve mahkemenin gerek\u00e7eli karardaki \u201dAncak ses kayd\u0131ndaki ifadenin k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele sonucu tespit edildi\u011fine dair \u015f\u00fcphe olu\u015ftu\u011fundan\u201d tespitine ra\u011fmen bu beyan ve ifadelerinin h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nmas\u0131 suretiyle CMK\u2019n\u0131n 206\/2-a ve 217\/1. maddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131lmas\u0131;<\/p>\n\n\n\n
12- Mahkeme ba\u015fkan\u0131nca, san\u0131k ve m\u00fcdafilerinin soru sorma haklar\u0131n uygun \u015fekilde yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle engellenmesi nedeniyle,<\/p>\n\n\n\n
a) Sorulara itiraz eden san\u0131k ve m\u00fcdafilerinin itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n usul ve yasaya uygun gerek\u00e7elerle reddedilmesi gerekirken, duru\u015fma g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcleri ve tutanak i\u00e7erikleri ile uyumlu olmayacak bi\u00e7imde disiplini bozduklar\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle reddedilmesi;<\/p>\n\n\n\n
b) 24.01.2012 tarihli oturumda san\u0131k \u2026\u2019in maddi tespit yaparak tan\u0131\u011fa soru sorma isteminin ve benzer \u015fekilde baz\u0131 san\u0131k veya m\u00fcdafilerinin ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde soru sorma taleplerinin kabul edilmeyerek tan\u0131\u011f\u0131 sorgulama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ve dolas\u0131yla savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131s\u0131tlanmas\u0131;<\/p>\n\n\n\n
c) 17.04.2012 tarihli oturumda san\u0131k \u2026.\u2019in, tan\u0131\u011fa sordu\u011fu soruya yan\u0131t alamamas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 ayn\u0131 soruyu tekrarlamas\u0131 \u00fczerine sorunun m\u00fckerrer oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle tan\u0131\u011fa y\u00f6neltilmesine izin verilmemesi ve benzer \u015fekilde ba\u015fka san\u0131k ve m\u00fcdafilerinin sorular\u0131n\u0131n engellenmesi;<\/p>\n\n\n\n
13- Kimli\u011finin gizlenmesine karar verilen tan\u0131klar\u0131n, kimliklerinin a\u00e7\u0131\u011fa \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131 engellenecek \u015fekilde kamera kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n, san\u0131k ve m\u00fcdafilerine verilmeyerek ifade \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm tutanaklar\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7e\u011fi yans\u0131t\u0131p yans\u0131tmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair san\u0131klara ve m\u00fcdafilerine denetim imkan\u0131 sa\u011flanmadan, bu ifadelerin h\u00fckm\u00fc esas al\u0131narak CMK 217. maddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131lmas\u0131;<\/p>\n\n\n\n
14- San\u0131klar\u2026.. ve \u2026 hakk\u0131nda gerek\u00e7ede belirtilen tan\u0131k \u2026..\u2019in kolluk ifadesinin dosya kapsam\u0131nda bulunmamas\u0131, gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n dipnotla bilgi notunda at\u0131f yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131, gizli tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n ifadesinin imzas\u0131z \u00f6rne\u011finin dosya aras\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131;<\/p>\n\n\n\n
15- Dosya kapsam\u0131nda, CMK\u2019n\u0131n 58\/3. maddesi ve Tan\u0131k Koruma Kanunu kapsam\u0131ndaki d\u00fczenlemeleri g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda tan\u0131klar\u0131n haz\u0131r bulunanlar\u0131n huzurunda dinlenmelerinin ne \u015fekilde haklar\u0131nda a\u011f\u0131r bir tehlike te\u015fkil etti\u011fi ve bu tehlikenin ba\u015fka t\u00fcrl\u00fc \u00f6nlenemeyece\u011fi ya da madd\u00ee ger\u00e7e\u011fin ortaya \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan tehlike olu\u015fturaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n hususlar\u0131nda sebep g\u00f6sterilmeden ve herhangi de\u011ferlendirmede bulunmadan tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n talebi \u00fczerine tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n kapal\u0131 oturum dinlenilmesine, tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n duru\u015fma salonu d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda bulunan tan\u0131k odas\u0131na al\u0131narak orijinal ses ve g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn duru\u015fma salonuna aktar\u0131lmak veya g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn de\u011fi\u015ftirilerek aktar\u0131lmak suretiyle dinlenmesi \u015feklinde tan\u0131k koruma tedbirlerine karar verildi\u011fi;<\/p>\n\n\n\n
16- Gizli tan\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131 bulunmayan tan\u0131klar\u0131n, \u00f6rne\u011fin tan\u0131klar \u2026., \u2026, \u2026, \u2026.\u2019\u0131n dinlenilmesinde oldu\u011fu gibi yasal ve yeterli gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterilmeksizin duru\u015fma d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kapal\u0131 bir oda i\u00e7inde g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc aktar\u0131m\u0131 suretiyle ifadesinin tespiti yoluna gidilerek CMK\u2019n\u0131n 200. maddesine muhalefet edilmesi;<\/p>\n\n\n\n
17- San\u0131k \u2026.\u2019in m\u00fcdafisi olarak g\u00f6rev yapan Av. \u2026.ile san\u0131k \u2026\u2019\u0131n m\u00fcdafiisi olarak g\u00f6rev yapan Av. \u2026.\u2019\u0131n Avukatl\u0131k Kanunu 36. maddesinde belirtilen usule ayk\u0131r\u0131 \u015fekilde tan\u0131k olarak ifadesinin h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nmas\u0131;<\/p>\n\n\n\n
18- \u2026. mensuplar\u0131n\u0131n dinlenilmesi hususunda 2937 say\u0131l\u0131 \u2026 Kanunu\u2019nun 29. maddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 davranmak suretiyle emekli \u2026.. mensubu \u2018 \u00fcn tan\u0131k olarak dinlenilmesi ve beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nmas\u0131;<\/p>\n\n\n\n
19- Yarg\u0131tay 11. Ceza Dairesinin (\u0130lk Derece S\u0131fat\u0131yla) 13.11.2015 tarih 2012\/1 Esas- 2015\/4 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda ger\u00e7e\u011fe ayk\u0131r\u0131 beyanda bulundu\u011fu tespit ve kabul edilen ve haklar\u0131nda bu nedenle soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen gizli tan\u0131k \u2026ve gizli tan\u0131k \u2026\u2019un beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nmas\u0131;<\/p>\n\n\n\n
20-Mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan, bir k\u0131s\u0131m san\u0131klar\u0131n \u2026 D\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce Derne\u011fi\u2019nin y\u00f6netimini ele ge\u00e7irildi\u011finin kabul edilmesi kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, san\u0131k \u2026.\u2019dan \u00f6nce dernek ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 yapan\u2026.n\u0131n tan\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131yla dinlenilmesinin gerekti\u011fini g\u00f6zetilmemesi;<\/p>\n\n\n\n
21-Tan\u0131k \u2026 gibi bir k\u0131s\u0131m tan\u0131klar\u0131n, san\u0131klar\u0131n savunmalar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda lehe anlat\u0131mda bulunmalar\u0131na ra\u011fmen bu tan\u0131klar\u0131n ifadesini ni\u00e7in itibar edilmedi\u011finin tart\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131p karar yerinde g\u00f6sterilmemesi;<\/p>\n\n\n\n
22-Kimli\u011finin gizlenerek dinlenilmesine karar verilen tan\u0131klar\u0131n dinlenilmesinde,<\/p>\n\n\n\n
a) Dosya kapsam\u0131nda, CMK 58\/2. maddesi ve Tan\u0131k Koruma Kanunu kapsam\u0131ndaki d\u00fczenlemeleri g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda tan\u0131k olarak dinlenecek ki\u015filerin kimliklerinin ortaya \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131 ne \u015fekilde haklar\u0131nda kendileri veya yak\u0131nlar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan a\u011f\u0131r bir tehlike olu\u015fturaca\u011f\u0131 hususunda sebep g\u00f6sterilmeden ve herhangi bir de\u011ferlendirmede bulunmadan, tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n talebi \u00fczerine kimli\u011finin gizlenerek dinlenilmesi, tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n duru\u015fma salonu d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda bulunan tan\u0131k odas\u0131na al\u0131narak orijinal ses ve g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn duru\u015fma salonuna aktar\u0131lmak; g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn veya sesinin de\u011fi\u015ftirilerek aktar\u0131lmak suretiyle dinlenmesi \u015feklinde tan\u0131k koruma tedbirlerine karar verilmesi;<\/p>\n\n\n\n
b) Tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n kimli\u011finin aleniyet kazanmas\u0131na (gizli tan\u0131k \u2026, gizli tan\u0131k 9 ) veya kimli\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131klayarak beyanda bulunmak istenmesine; tan\u0131klar\u0131n kimliklerinin a\u00e7\u0131klanarak(gizli tan\u0131k \u2026) veya orijinal ses\/g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcs\u00fcyle (gizli tan\u0131k 17, gizli tan\u0131k \u2026) dinlendi\u011fi halde bu tan\u0131klar hakk\u0131nda al\u0131nan koruma tedbirlerinin gereklili\u011fi ve yararl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 kalmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 ra\u011fmen koruma tedbirlerinin kald\u0131r\u0131lmadan tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n dinlenmesi ve sorgulamas\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131lmas\u0131;<\/p>\n\n\n\n
c) Y\u00fcksek g\u00fcvenlikli cezaevlerinde h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc olarak bulunan \u2026. ve \u2026. gibi ki\u015filerin devletin korumas\u0131 alt\u0131nda oldu\u011fu halde, tan\u0131klar\u0131n kimliklerinin ortaya \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131 ne \u015fekilde haklar\u0131nda kendileri veya yak\u0131nlar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan a\u011f\u0131r bir tehlike olu\u015fturaca\u011f\u0131 hususunda de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmadan ve koruma tedbiri gerek\u00e7eleri a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtilmeden kimliklerinin gizlenerek dinlenilmesi;<\/p>\n\n\n\n
d) Gizli tan\u0131klar\u0131n kimli\u011finin a\u00e7\u0131\u011fa \u00e7\u0131kmamas\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle g\u00fcvenilirli\u011fi ve s\u00f6zlerinin do\u011frulu\u011fu tespit edecek nitelikte sorular\u0131n sorulmas\u0131na engel olunmas\u0131 suretiyle CMK\u2019n\u0131n 58\/1.maddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131lmas\u0131,<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\nVidal v. Belgium<\/strong>
Ba\u015fvuru No: 12351\/86<\/strong>
Karar Tarihi: 22.04.1992<\/strong><\/h5>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n“Madde 6<\/strong>
Madde 6-1<\/strong>
Adil yarg\u0131lanma
Silahlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi
Madde 6-3-d<\/strong>
Tan\u0131k sorgulama<\/p>\n\n\n\nBir temyiz mahkemesinin, Yarg\u0131tay bozmas\u0131ndan sonra g\u00f6r\u00fclen davada, san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6nerilen lehine tan\u0131klar\u0131 dinlememesi: ihlal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
I. S\u00f6zle\u015fme\u2019nin 6. maddesinin 1. ve 3 (d) paragraflar\u0131<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\nMadde 6 \u00a7 3 (d): Tan\u0131k deliline ili\u015fkin de\u011ferlendirme yetkisi prensip olarak ulusal mahkemelere aittir. Bu madde, her san\u0131k lehine g\u00f6sterilen tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n mutlaka dinlenmesini zorunlu k\u0131lmaz, ancak esas amac\u0131 bu konuda tam bir “silahlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi” sa\u011flamakt\u0131r. Somut olayda, temyiz mahkemesi ne aleyhte ne de lehte herhangi bir tan\u0131k dinlemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Bununla birlikte, “silahlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi” ilkesi, 6. maddenin 3 (d) paragraf\u0131n\u0131n veya 1. paragraf\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcm kapsam\u0131n\u0131 t\u00fcketmez. Bu nedenle, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n b\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcyle adil olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmelidir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Ba\u015fvurucu, ilk derece mahkemesinde birka\u00e7 tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n dinlenmesinden sonra beraat etmi\u015f, ancak istinaf mahkemesinde \u00f6nce iki san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, ard\u0131ndan yaln\u0131zca bir san\u0131\u011f\u0131n beyanlar\u0131na ve dosyadaki belgelere dayan\u0131larak mahk\u00fbm edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Temyiz mahkemesi, d\u00f6rt tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n dinlenmesine y\u00f6nelik talebi sessiz kalarak reddetmi\u015ftir. Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi, delil sunma talebinin reddedilmesinin gerek\u00e7elendirilmemesinin adil yarg\u0131lanma ilkesiyle ba\u011fda\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir. \u00d6zellikle de ba\u015fvurucunun cezas\u0131n\u0131n a\u011f\u0131rla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, bu durumun adil bir yarg\u0131lama ile \u00f6rt\u00fc\u015fmedi\u011fine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Sonu\u00e7:<\/strong> Madde 6\u2019n\u0131n ihlali (sekiz oya kar\u015f\u0131 bir oyla).”<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nKostovski v. The Netherlands<\/strong>
Ba\u015fvuru No: 11454\/85<\/strong>
Karar Tarihi: 20 Kas\u0131m 1989<\/strong><\/h5>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n“OLAYLAR<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Ba\u015fvuran Slobodan Kostovski, 1953 do\u011fumlu bir Yugoslav vatanda\u015f\u0131d\u0131r. Hollanda\u2019da bir\u00e7ok su\u00e7tan sab\u0131kas\u0131 bulunan Kostovski, 1979 y\u0131l\u0131nda bir kuyumcu d\u00fckk\u00e2n\u0131na yap\u0131lan silahl\u0131 soyguna kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle 6 y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131na \u00e7arpt\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
8 A\u011fustos 1981\u2019de Scheveningen hapishanesinden ka\u00e7an Kostovski, 20 Ocak 1982\u2019de Baarn\u2019daki bir bankaya yap\u0131lan silahl\u0131 soyguna kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131yla yakalanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Polis soru\u015fturmas\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda, kimli\u011fi gizli tutulan iki ki\u015fi taraf\u0131ndan verilen ifadeler temelinde Kostovski\u2019nin soyguna kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
YARGILAMA S\u00dcREC\u0130<\/p>\n\n\n\n
1. Ulusal Mahkemelerde Yarg\u0131lama<\/p>\n\n\n\n
– Utrecht B\u00f6lge Mahkemesi, kimli\u011fi gizli tutulan tan\u0131klar\u0131n ifadelerine dayanarak Kostovski\u2019yi su\u00e7lu bulmu\u015f ve 6 y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131na \u00e7arpt\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
– Amsterdam Temyiz Mahkemesi de benzer \u015fekilde tan\u0131klar\u0131n kimliklerini a\u00e7\u0131klamadan verdi\u011fi ifadeleri kabul etmi\u015f ve ayn\u0131 cezay\u0131 onam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
– Hollanda Y\u00fcksek Mahkemesi, 25 Eyl\u00fcl 1984\u2019te temyiz ba\u015fvurusunu reddetmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
2. A\u0130HM Ba\u015fvurusu ve \u0130ncelemesi<\/p>\n\n\n\n
– Kostovski, Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi\u2019ne ba\u015fvurarak adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
– Mahkeme, 12 May\u0131s 1988\u2019de davay\u0131 kabul edilebilir bulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
MAHKEMEN\u0130N DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RMES\u0130<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Mahkeme, Kostovski\u2019nin adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n (A\u0130HS 6. madde) ihlal edildi\u011fine h\u00fckmetmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
– Tan\u0131klar\u0131 sorgulama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlali: Kostovski, aleyhindeki tan\u0131klar\u0131 sorgulama veya sorgulatma hakk\u0131ndan mahrum b\u0131rak\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
– Anonim tan\u0131kl\u0131k ve savunma hakk\u0131: Mahkeme, anonim tan\u0131k ifadelerine dayal\u0131 bir mahk\u00fbmiyetin san\u0131\u011f\u0131n savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131 ciddi \u015fekilde k\u0131s\u0131tlad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
H\u00fck\u00fcmet, su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fctleriyle m\u00fccadelede anonim tan\u0131kl\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00f6nemini vurgulam\u0131\u015f ancak Mahkeme, adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n kamu yarar\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle ihlal edilemeyece\u011fine karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
KARAR<\/p>\n\n\n\n
1. Adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi kabul edilmi\u015ftir (17\u2019ye kar\u015f\u0131 1 oyla).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
2. Tazminat talebi karara ba\u011flanmam\u0131\u015f, taraflar\u0131n uzla\u015fma sa\u011flamas\u0131 i\u00e7in ek s\u00fcre tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Bu karar, san\u0131klar\u0131n anonim tan\u0131k ifadeleri temelinde mahk\u00fbm edilmesini zorla\u015ft\u0131ran \u00f6nemli bir i\u00e7tihat olu\u015fturmu\u015ftur.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\nMarcus ELLIS, Rodrigo SIMMS ve Nathan Antonio MARTIN v. Birle\u015fik Krall\u0131k<\/strong>
Ba\u015fvuru No: 46099\/06 ve 46699\/06<\/strong>
Karar Tarihi: 10 Nisan 2012<\/strong><\/h5>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n“OLAYLAR<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Ba\u015fvuranlar Marcus Ellis, Rodrigo Simms ve Nathan Martin, 2002 y\u0131l\u0131nda Birmingham\u2019da ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen silahl\u0131 sald\u0131r\u0131lar sonucu iki gen\u00e7 kad\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcyle su\u00e7lanm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r. Sald\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7ete ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 oldu\u011fu ve bir intikam eylemi oldu\u011fu iddia edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
DEL\u0130LLER<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Su\u00e7lamalar; gizli tan\u0131klar\u0131n ifadeleri, telefon kay\u0131tlar\u0131, CCTV g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcleri ve san\u0131klar\u0131n ge\u00e7mi\u015f \u00e7ete ba\u011flant\u0131lar\u0131na dayand\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. En \u00f6nemli tan\u0131klardan biri olan “Mark Brown”, san\u0131klar\u0131 sald\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi araban\u0131n i\u00e7inde g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc iddia etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
G\u0130ZL\u0130 TANIKLIK<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Savc\u0131l\u0131k, baz\u0131 tan\u0131klar\u0131n kimliklerinin a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n g\u00fcvenlik riski ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ne s\u00fcrerek gizli tan\u0131kl\u0131k sistemini kullanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Mahkeme, tan\u0131klar\u0131n korunmas\u0131n\u0131n gerekli oldu\u011funa karar vermi\u015f, ancak san\u0131klar\u0131n savunma haklar\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etmeyecek \u015fekilde \u00e7apraz sorgu yapmalar\u0131na izin verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
MAHKEME KARARI<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Mahkeme, gizli tan\u0131k Mark Brown\u2019un ifadesini g\u00fcvenilir bulmu\u015f ve di\u011fer delillerle desteklendi\u011fini de\u011ferlendirmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvuranlar, iki cinayet ve iki cinayete te\u015febb\u00fcsten su\u00e7lu bulunarak \u00f6m\u00fcr boyu hapse mahk\u00fbm edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
TEMY\u0130Z S\u00dcREC\u0130<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Ba\u015fvuranlar, gizli tan\u0131kl\u0131\u011f\u0131n adil yarg\u0131lanma haklar\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etti\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi\u2019ne ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. A\u0130HM, gizli tan\u0131kl\u0131\u011f\u0131n belirleyici kan\u0131t olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve adil yarg\u0131lama ilkesine uyulup uyulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 incelemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
MAHKEMEN\u0130N DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RMES\u0130<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Mahkeme, tan\u0131klar\u0131n g\u00fcvenli\u011fini koruman\u0131n \u00f6nemli oldu\u011funu, ancak san\u0131klar\u0131n kendilerini savunma haklar\u0131n\u0131n da ihlal edilmemesi gerekti\u011fini vurgulam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Gizli tan\u0131kl\u0131\u011f\u0131n mahk\u00fbmiyetin tek veya belirleyici dayana\u011f\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve adil yarg\u0131lama i\u00e7in yeterli g\u00fcvencelerin sa\u011flan\u0131p sa\u011flanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\nVisser v. Hollanda<\/strong>
Ba\u015fvuru No: 26668\/95<\/strong>
Karar Tarihi: 14.02.2002<\/strong><\/h5>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n“Madde 6 – Adil Yarg\u0131lanma Hakk\u0131<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Madde 6-3-d – Tan\u0131klar\u0131n Dinlenmesi<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Tan\u0131k \u0130fadesinin Mahkemede Kullan\u0131lmas\u0131: Gizli Tan\u0131k Beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n Kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 ve \u0130hlal<\/p>\n\n\n\n
OLAYLAR<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Ba\u015fvuran, temyiz mahkemesinin ba\u015fvurusu \u00fczerine, bir ki\u015finin zorla al\u0131konulmas\u0131nda yard\u0131mc\u0131 olmak su\u00e7undan mahkum edilmi\u015ftir. Mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131nda, ba\u015fvuran\u0131 foto\u011fraflardan tan\u0131yan anonim bir tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n ifadelerine \u00f6zellikle at\u0131fta bulunulmu\u015ftur. Y\u00fcksek Mahkeme, gizli tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin ko\u015fullar\u0131n yerine getirilmedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131n\u0131 bozmu\u015f ve davay\u0131 farkl\u0131 bir Temyiz Mahkemesi’ne g\u00f6ndermi\u015ftir. Bu mahkeme, soru\u015fturma hakimine tan\u0131\u011f\u0131 dinlemesini talimat\u0131 vermi\u015ftir. Soru\u015fturma hakimi, tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n ba\u015fvuran\u0131n san\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n intikam almak amac\u0131yla i\u015flenen su\u00e7la ilgili korkusu nedeniyle anonim kalma iste\u011finin hakl\u0131 oldu\u011funa karar vermi\u015ftir. Sonu\u00e7 olarak, ba\u015fvuran\u0131n avukat\u0131 ayr\u0131 bir odada bulunurken, tan\u0131k, soru\u015fturma hakimi taraf\u0131ndan sorgulanm\u0131\u015f ve ba\u015fvuran\u0131n avukat\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan iletilen baz\u0131 sorular da sorulmu\u015ftur. Temyiz Mahkemesi daha sonra, ba\u015fvuran\u0131, anonim tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n ifadeleri ve \u00e7e\u015fitli raporlar ile resmi kay\u0131tlara dayal\u0131 olarak mahkum etmi\u015ftir. Y\u00fcksek Mahkeme, ba\u015fvuran\u0131n temyiz ba\u015fvurusunu reddetmi\u015f ve soru\u015fturma hakiminin anonimlik konusunda yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmeyi kabul etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
HUKUK<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Madde 6 \u00a7 3 (d) \u2013 Soru\u015fturma hakiminin raporu, san\u0131klar\u0131n tan\u0131\u011fa y\u00f6nelik korkular\u0131n\u0131 dikkate alarak, tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n ifade verdi\u011fi zaman dilimindeki korkular\u0131n\u0131n makul olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 nas\u0131l de\u011ferlendirdi\u011fini g\u00f6stermemektedir. Ayr\u0131ca, Temyiz Mahkemesi, tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n anonim olma nedenlerinin ciddiyetini ve ge\u00e7erlili\u011fini incelememi\u015ftir ve bu ko\u015fullarda Mahkeme, tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00e7\u0131karlar\u0131n\u0131n savunman\u0131n haklar\u0131na bu kadar b\u00fcy\u00fck bir s\u0131n\u0131rlama getirilmesini hakl\u0131 \u00e7\u0131karacak \u015fekilde yeterli oldu\u011funu kabul etmemi\u015ftir. 1994 y\u0131l\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren yasa, belirli g\u00fcvenceler sa\u011flamaktad\u0131r. Ayr\u0131ca, ba\u015fvuran\u0131n mahk\u00fbmiyeti b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde anonim tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n ifadelerine dayanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu nedenle, Mahkeme, adli makamlar\u0131n gizli tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n savunman\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 zorluklar\u0131 yeterince dengeleyecek \u015fekilde i\u015flem yap\u0131p yapmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 incelemeyi gerekli g\u00f6rmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
SONU\u00c7<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u0130hlal (oy birli\u011fiyle).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Madde 41:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Mahkeme, ba\u015fvuran\u0131n maddi olmayan zararlar\u0131 i\u00e7in 6.000 Euro tazminat \u00f6denmesine ve ayr\u0131ca masraflar ve giderler i\u00e7in \u00f6deme yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.”<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Ceza yarg\u0131lamalar\u0131nda tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131, deliller aras\u0131nda \u00f6nemli bir yer tutar. Ancak organize su\u00e7lar ve ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fctleriyle m\u00fccadele gibi alanlarda tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n veya yak\u0131nlar\u0131n\u0131n hayat\u0131, beden b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ya da mal varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ciddi tehlike alt\u0131nda kalabilir. \u0130\u015fte bu noktada devreye giren gizli tan\u0131k uygulamas\u0131, hem tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00fcvenli\u011fini sa\u011flamay\u0131 hem de maddi ger\u00e7e\u011fin ortaya \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 ama\u00e7lar. Uygulama, savunma hakk\u0131 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,2],"tags":[129,127,125,128,126],"class_list":["post-1625","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ceza-hukuku","category-makaleler","tag-adil-yargilanma-hakki","tag-cmk-58-gizli-tanik","tag-gizli-tanik","tag-gizli-tanik-beyani","tag-tanik-koruma-kanunu"],"blocksy_meta":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/altinova.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1625","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/altinova.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/altinova.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/altinova.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/altinova.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1625"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/altinova.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1625\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1628,"href":"https:\/\/altinova.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1625\/revisions\/1628"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/altinova.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1625"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/altinova.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1625"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/altinova.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1625"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}