T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu (TMK), evlilik d\u0131\u015f\u0131 do\u011fan \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n miras haklar\u0131n\u0131 net ve e\u015fitlik\u00e7i bir yakla\u015f\u0131mla d\u00fczenlemektedir. Anne taraf\u0131ndan soyba\u011f\u0131 do\u011fumla kuruldu\u011fu i\u00e7in evlilik d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u00e7ocuklar, annenin miras\u0131nda evlilik i\u00e7i \u00e7ocuklarla tamamen ayn\u0131 haklara sahiptir. Baba taraf\u0131ndan ise miras hakk\u0131, soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tan\u0131ma veya h\u00e2kim h\u00fckm\u00fcyle kurulmas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. Soyba\u011f\u0131 kurulduktan sonra evlilik d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u00e7ocuk, baba y\u00f6n\u00fcnden de evlilik i\u00e7i h\u0131s\u0131mlar gibi yasal miras\u00e7\u0131 olur ve miras paylar\u0131 aras\u0131nda hi\u00e7bir ayr\u0131m yap\u0131lmaz (TMK m. 498).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Bu yaz\u0131da, 2026 itibar\u0131yla y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte olan g\u00fcncel yasal \u00e7er\u00e7eve, soyba\u011f\u0131 kurulmas\u0131 usulleri, miras paylar\u0131n\u0131n hesaplanmas\u0131, hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcreler ve Yarg\u0131tay uygulamalar\u0131 en ince ayr\u0131nt\u0131s\u0131na kadar ele al\u0131nmaktad\u0131r. Konu, 6NOVA Avukatl\u0131k B\u00fcrosu uzmanl\u0131\u011f\u0131yla haz\u0131rlanm\u0131\u015f olup, miras hukuku ve aile hukuku alan\u0131nda profesyonel rehberlik sunmay\u0131 ama\u00e7lamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Evlilik d\u0131\u015f\u0131 do\u011fan \u00e7ocuk ile anne aras\u0131ndaki soyba\u011f\u0131, do\u011fum an\u0131nda kendili\u011finden kurulur (TMK m. 282). Bu nedenle anne taraf\u0131ndan miras hakk\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan evlilik i\u00e7i ve evlilik d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u00e7ocuklar aras\u0131nda hi\u00e7bir fark yoktur. \u00c7ocuk, annesinin yasal miras\u00e7\u0131s\u0131 s\u0131fat\u0131yla altsoy z\u00fcmresinde yer al\u0131r ve di\u011fer karde\u015fleriyle e\u015fit pay al\u0131r (TMK m. 495).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Anne vefat etti\u011finde miras payla\u015f\u0131m\u0131 yap\u0131l\u0131rken evlilik d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u00e7ocuk, annenin ta\u015f\u0131n\u0131r-ta\u015f\u0131nmaz mallar\u0131, banka hesaplar\u0131, ara\u00e7lar ve di\u011fer haklar\u0131 \u00fczerinde tam miras\u00e7\u0131 stat\u00fcs\u00fcne sahiptir. Bu hak, soyba\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin herhangi bir ek i\u015flem gerektirmez. Uygulamada, annenin miras\u00e7\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131z kabul edilir ve n\u00fcfus kayd\u0131ndaki \u201cevlilik d\u0131\u015f\u0131 do\u011fum\u201d ibaresi miras hakk\u0131n\u0131 etkilemez.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Baba y\u00f6n\u00fcnden miras hakk\u0131, soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kurulmas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. TMK m. 498 a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a h\u00fck\u00fcm koymu\u015ftur: \u201cEvlilik d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda do\u011fmu\u015f ve soyba\u011f\u0131, tan\u0131ma veya h\u00e2kim h\u00fckm\u00fcyle kurulmu\u015f olanlar, baba y\u00f6n\u00fcnden evlilik i\u00e7i h\u0131s\u0131mlar gibi miras\u00e7\u0131 olurlar.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Soyba\u011f\u0131 kurulmadan \u00f6nce evlilik d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u00e7ocuk, baban\u0131n miras\u0131nda yasal miras\u00e7\u0131 say\u0131lmaz. Ancak soyba\u011f\u0131 tan\u0131nd\u0131ktan veya mahkeme karar\u0131yla tespit edildikten sonra \u00e7ocuk, baban\u0131n altsoyu olarak tam miras\u00e7\u0131 olur. Bu durumda miras pay\u0131, evlilik i\u00e7i karde\u015flerle tamamen e\u015fitlenir. \u00c7ocuk, baban\u0131n sakl\u0131 pay\u0131 dahil olmak \u00fczere yasal miras pay\u0131n\u0131n tamam\u0131n\u0131 talep edebilir. Miras\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131ndan sonra soyba\u011f\u0131 kurulursa, daha \u00f6nce yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f miras payla\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n iptali ve yeniden payla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Soyba\u011f\u0131 \u00fc\u00e7 temel yolla kurulur:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Soyba\u011f\u0131 kurulduktan sonra \u00e7ocuk, baban\u0131n soyad\u0131n\u0131 alabilir, velayet d\u00fczenlenir ve miras hakk\u0131 tam olarak do\u011far. N\u00fcfus kayd\u0131ndaki d\u00fczeltme, miras davalar\u0131nda kesin delil te\u015fkil eder.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Soyba\u011f\u0131 kurulmu\u015f evlilik d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u00e7ocuk, miras payla\u015f\u0131m\u0131nda evlilik i\u00e7i \u00e7ocuklarla e\u015fit stat\u00fcdedir. Mirasb\u0131rakan\u0131n e\u015fi hayattaysa ve altsoyu varsa miras\u0131n \u00bc\u2019\u00fc e\u015fe, \u00be\u2019\u00fc \u00e7ocuklara e\u015fit olarak payla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131l\u0131r. Evlilik d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u00e7ocuk bu paydan tam olarak yararlan\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u00d6rnek: Baba, e\u015fi ve iki \u00e7ocuk (biri evlilik i\u00e7i, biri evlilik d\u0131\u015f\u0131) b\u0131rakarak vefat ederse her \u00e7ocuk miras\u0131n 3\/8\u2019ini al\u0131r. Soyba\u011f\u0131 kurulmam\u0131\u015fsa evlilik d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u00e7ocuk mirastan pay alamaz. Miras\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131ndan sonra soyba\u011f\u0131 kurulursa tenkis davas\u0131 veya miras\u0131n iptali yoluyla geriye d\u00f6n\u00fck hak talep edilebilir. Miras ortakl\u0131\u011f\u0131 devam ederken evlilik d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u00e7ocuk, tereke mallar\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131 ve y\u00f6netiminde di\u011fer miras\u00e7\u0131larla e\u015fit haklara sahiptir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Bu s\u00fcreler, hak kayb\u0131na yol a\u00e7abilece\u011finden derhal avukat deste\u011fi al\u0131nmas\u0131 tavsiye edilir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Yarg\u0131tay, soyba\u011f\u0131 ve miras davalar\u0131nda kamu d\u00fczenini, \u00e7ocu\u011fun \u00fcst\u00fcn menfaatini ve bilimsel delilleri (DNA) \u00f6n planda tutmaktad\u0131r. Eski i\u00e7tihatlar (\u00f6rne\u011fin 2015 tarihli 2. Hukuk Dairesi kararlar\u0131) g\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fczde de temel al\u0131nmakta; ancak DNA testi zorunlulu\u011fu ve vekille tan\u0131ma beyan\u0131n\u0131n ge\u00e7ersizli\u011fi vurgulanmaktad\u0131r. Son y\u0131llarda Yarg\u0131tay, aldatma veya evlenme vaadi gibi durumlarda hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcrenin lehine yorumland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ger\u00e7e\u011fe ayk\u0131r\u0131 n\u00fcfus kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczeltilmesinde asliye hukuk mahkemesi g\u00f6revinin bulundu\u011funu ve miras payla\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n soyba\u011f\u0131 kurulduktan sonra yeniden yap\u0131labilece\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Uygulamada, babal\u0131k davas\u0131nda DNA raporu al\u0131nmadan karar verilememekte, tan\u0131ma beyan\u0131n\u0131n bizzat baba taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131 aranmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
MAHKEMES\u0130: <\/strong>Aile Mahkemesi<\/p>\n\n\n\n DAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc: <\/strong>\u00c7ocukla Ki\u015fisel \u0130li\u015fki Kurulmas\u0131 ve Soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n TespitiTaraflar aras\u0131ndaki \u201cki\u015fisel ili\u015fki tesisine\u201d dair dava ile, ayn\u0131 davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan daval\u0131ya kar\u015f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lan \u201csoyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespiti\u201d davas\u0131n\u0131n birle\u015ftirilerek yap\u0131lan muhakemesi sonunda mahalli mahkemece verilen yukar\u0131da tarihi ve numaras\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen h\u00fck\u00fcm, daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle, evrak okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Davac\u0131, 3.4.2014 tarihinde a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 dava ile, daval\u0131 ile evlilik d\u0131\u015f\u0131 ili\u015fkisinden d\u00fcnyaya gelen \u00e7ocukla ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki hakk\u0131 tan\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 istemi\u015ftir. Bu davada, \u00e7ocukla davac\u0131 aras\u0131nda soyba\u011f\u0131 kurulmam\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funun g\u00f6r\u00fclmesi \u00fczerine mahkemece, davac\u0131ya, \u00e7ocukla soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kurulmas\u0131 davas\u0131 a\u00e7mak \u00fczere s\u00fcre verilmi\u015f, davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan, \u00e7ocukla davac\u0131 aras\u0131nda soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespiti talebiyle 7.5.2014 tarihinde a\u00e7\u0131lan 2014\/351 esas say\u0131l\u0131 dava, ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki tesisine ili\u015fkin dava ile birle\u015ftirilerek g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f; mahkemece; \u201c k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck …’\u0131n davac\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131z\u0131 oldu\u011funun tespitine, davac\u0131 ile \u00e7ocuk aras\u0131nda ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki kurulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015f, \u00e7ocuk lehine talep tarihinden itibaren ayl\u0131k 150.-lira tedbir, karar\u0131n kesinle\u015fmesinden itibaren de ayn\u0131 miktarda i\u015ftirak nafakas\u0131na\u201d h\u00fckmedilmi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131 daval\u0131 temyiz etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n K\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck …, 10.3.2014 do\u011fumludur. Annesi daval\u0131 …’nun evlili\u011fi 8.5.2013 tarihinde kesinle\u015fen bo\u015fanma karar\u0131yla sona ermi\u015f, \u00e7ocuk evlili\u011fin sona ermesinden itibaren \u00fc\u00e7 y\u00fcz g\u00fcn ge\u00e7tikten sonra d\u00fcnyaya gelmi\u015ftir. Bu halde \u00e7ocu\u011fun bir ba\u015fka erkekle soyba\u011f\u0131 ili\u015fkisi mevcut de\u011fildir. Nitekim, k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn, annesinin k\u0131zl\u0131k hanesine \u201c evlilik d\u0131\u015f\u0131 do\u011fum\u201d olarak 10.3.2014 tarihinde tescil edilmi\u015f oldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Evlilik d\u0131\u015f\u0131 ili\u015fkiden d\u00fcnyaya gelen \u00e7ocu\u011fun, bir ba\u015fka erkekle soyba\u011f\u0131 mevcut olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re, davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan \u201ctan\u0131nmas\u0131na\u201d hukuken bir engel bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Ba\u015fka bir ifade ile davac\u0131, daval\u0131 ile evlilik d\u0131\u015f\u0131 ili\u015fkisinden do\u011fan \u00e7ocu\u011fu Medeni Kanun h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine (m. 295) g\u00f6re tan\u0131yabilir ve soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bu suretle kurulmas\u0131 sa\u011flanabilir. Tan\u0131ma; baban\u0131n, resmi senetle veya vasiyetnamesinde yapaca\u011f\u0131 beyanla m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011fu gibi, n\u00fcfus memuruna veya mahkemeye yaz\u0131l\u0131 ba\u015fvuruda bulunmas\u0131yla da yap\u0131labilir. (TMK. m. 295\/1)<\/p>\n\n\n\n Davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131lan ve ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki tesisine dair dava ile birle\u015ftirilen \u201csoyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespiti\u201d iste\u011fine ili\u015fkin dava; mahkemeye yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f yaz\u0131l\u0131 tan\u0131ma ba\u015fvurusu niteli\u011finde g\u00f6r\u00fclebilir ise de, bu dava, davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan de\u011fil vekili taraf\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Tan\u0131ma beyan\u0131, \u015fahsa s\u0131k\u0131 s\u0131k\u0131ya ba\u011fl\u0131 haklardan olup, tan\u0131yan ki\u015fi taraf\u0131ndan bizzat kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 zorunludur. Akdi ya da kanuni temsil burada ge\u00e7erli de\u011fildir. Bu bak\u0131mdan davac\u0131n\u0131n vekilinin a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u201csoyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespiti\u201d iste\u011fine ili\u015fkin davay\u0131, baban\u0131n yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u201ctan\u0131ma beyan\u0131\u201d olarak nitelendirmek olana\u011f\u0131 da yoktur. \u00c7ocuk ile baba aras\u0131ndaki soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n mahkemece belirlenmesini yasal olarak ana ve \u00e7ocuk isteyebilece\u011fine (TMK. m. 301\/1), genetik babaya babal\u0131k davas\u0131 a\u00e7ma hakk\u0131 tan\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re, bu davay\u0131 \u201c babal\u0131k davas\u0131\u201d olarak vas\u0131fland\u0131rmak da m\u00fcmk\u00fcn bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Bu sebeple, mahkemece; kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck Tu\u011fsem Reyhan’\u0131n davac\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131z\u0131 oldu\u011funun tespiti\u201d y\u00f6n\u00fcnde karar verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131, davac\u0131 ile \u00e7ocuk aras\u0131nda soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131 tesis etmez. Durum b\u00f6yle olmakla birlikte, davac\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7ocukla aras\u0131nda “tan\u0131ma” (TMK m. 295) yoluyla soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131 tesis etmesi imkan\u0131 halen mevcuttur.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u00d6yleyse, davac\u0131ya; daval\u0131 ile evlilik d\u0131\u015f\u0131 ili\u015fkisinden d\u00fcnyaya gelen \u00e7ocu\u011funu T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanununun 295. maddesi h\u00fck\u00fcmleri \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde tan\u0131mas\u0131 imkan\u0131 verilmeli, \u00e7ocukla davac\u0131 aras\u0131nda soyba\u011f\u0131 tesis edildikten sonra davac\u0131ya ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki hakk\u0131 tan\u0131n\u0131p tan\u0131nmayaca\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmelidir. A\u00e7\u0131klanan y\u00f6nler g\u00f6zetilmeden yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 do\u011fru bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.SONU\u00c7: Temyiz edilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn yukar\u0131da g\u00f6sterilen sebeple BOZULMASINA, bozma sebebine g\u00f6re di\u011fer y\u00f6nlerin incelenmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde yat\u0131rana geri verilmesine, i\u015fbu karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren 15 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi. 22.04.2015 (\u00c7r\u015f.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n MAHKEMES\u0130: <\/strong>Aile Mahkemesi<\/p>\n\n\n\n Dava dilek\u00e7esinde, davac\u0131n\u0131n babas\u0131n\u0131n … olmay\u0131p … oldu\u011funun tespiti istenilmi\u015ftir. Mahkemece davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015f, h\u00fck\u00fcm daval\u0131 … taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n YARGITAY KARARI<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Temyiz isteminin s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra dosyadaki b\u00fct\u00fcn ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunup gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Davac\u0131 vekili dava dilek\u00e7esinde, davac\u0131n\u0131n annesi…’n\u0131n, …’dan bo\u015fan\u0131p bir s\u00fcre gayriresmi birlikte ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131 daval\u0131 … ile evlendi\u011fini, bu evlilik \u00f6ncesi ili\u015fkiden davac\u0131n\u0131n do\u011fdu\u011funu, davac\u0131n\u0131n kayden babas\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fcnen daval\u0131 …’\u0131n davac\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7ek babas\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu durumu davac\u0131n\u0131n yeni \u00f6\u011frendi\u011fini, birle\u015fen dava dilek\u00e7esinde de ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde davac\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7ek babas\u0131n\u0131n … oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrerek soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n reddine ve babal\u0131\u011f\u0131n tespitine karar verilmesini istemi\u015f, mahkemece davalar\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 4721 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanununun 293. maddesinde; ” E\u015fler, evlilik d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda do\u011fmu\u015f olan ortak \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131, evlenme s\u0131ras\u0131nda veya evlenmeden sonra, yerle\u015fim yerlerindeki veya evlenmenin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 yerdeki n\u00fcfus memuruna bildirmek zorundad\u0131rlar. Bildirimin yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131, \u00e7ocu\u011fun evlilik i\u00e7inde do\u011fan \u00e7ocuklara ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcmlere tabi olmas\u0131n\u0131 engellemez.”, 294. maddesinde: \u201cAna ve baban\u0131n yasal miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131, \u00e7ocuk ve Cumhuriyet Savc\u0131s\u0131 sonradan evlenme yoluyla soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kurulmas\u0131na itiraz edebilirler. \u0130tiraz eden, kocan\u0131n baba olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ispatla y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcd\u00fcr. \u00c7ocu\u011fun altsoyu da, \u00e7ocu\u011fun \u00f6lm\u00fc\u015f ya da ay\u0131rt etme g\u00fcc\u00fcn\u00fc s\u00fcrekli olarak kaybetmi\u015f olmas\u0131 halinde itiraz hakk\u0131na sahiptir. Tan\u0131man\u0131n iptaline ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcmler k\u0131yas yoluyla uygulan\u0131r.”, ayn\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 300. maddesinde ise; “Tan\u0131yan\u0131n dava hakk\u0131, iptal sebebinin \u00f6\u011frenildi\u011fi veya korkunun etkisinin ortadan kalkt\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihten ba\u015flayarak bir y\u0131l ve her halde tan\u0131man\u0131n \u00fczerinden be\u015f y\u0131l ge\u00e7mekle d\u00fc\u015fer. \u0130lgililerin dava hakk\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n tan\u0131may\u0131 ve tan\u0131yan\u0131n \u00e7ocu\u011fun babas\u0131 olamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6\u011frendi\u011fi tarihten ba\u015flayarak bir y\u0131l ve her halde tan\u0131man\u0131n \u00fczerinden be\u015f y\u0131l ge\u00e7mekle d\u00fc\u015fer. \u00c7ocu\u011fun dava hakk\u0131, ergin olmas\u0131ndan ba\u015flayarak bir y\u0131l ge\u00e7mekle d\u00fc\u015fer. Yukar\u0131daki s\u00fcreler ge\u00e7ti\u011fi halde gecikmeyi hakl\u0131 k\u0131lan sebep varsa, sebebin ortadan kalkmas\u0131ndan ba\u015flayarak bir ay i\u00e7inde dava a\u00e7\u0131labilir.”, 295. maddesinde; “Ba\u015fka bir erkek ile soyba\u011f\u0131 bulunan \u00e7ocuk, bu ba\u011f ge\u00e7ersiz k\u0131l\u0131nmad\u0131k\u00e7a tan\u0131namaz.” h\u00fck\u00fcmleri yer almaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Somut olayda; davac\u0131 vekili, davac\u0131n\u0131n annesi…’n\u0131n, …’dan bo\u015fand\u0131ktan sonra, bir s\u00fcre gayriresmi birlikte ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131 daval\u0131 … ile evlendi\u011fini, bu evlilik \u00f6ncesi ili\u015fkiden davac\u0131n\u0131n oldu\u011funu, davac\u0131n\u0131n kayden babas\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fcnen daval\u0131 …’\u0131n ger\u00e7ek babas\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7ek babas\u0131n\u0131n … oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrerek soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n reddi ile babal\u0131\u011f\u0131n tespitini istemi\u015f, mahkemece soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n reddi ile babal\u0131k davas\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Dosyadaki bilgi ve belgelerden; davac\u0131n\u0131n 05.01.1983 tarihinde do\u011fdu\u011fu, n\u00fcfusa 05.01.1990 tarihinde tescil edildi\u011fi, davac\u0131n\u0131n annesi…’n\u0131n 13.01.1975 tarihinde … ile evlendi\u011fi ve 20.01.1981 tarihinde bo\u015fand\u0131\u011f\u0131, bir s\u00fcre daval\u0131 … ile evlilik d\u0131\u015f\u0131 olarak birlikte ya\u015fad\u0131ktan sonra 03.01.1990 tarihinde onunla evlendi\u011fi, anne… ile daval\u0131 …’\u0131n evlilik \u00f6ncesi ili\u015fkilerinden oldu\u011funa dair ortak bildirimleri \u00fczerine davac\u0131n\u0131n n\u00fcfusa tescil edildi\u011fi, davac\u0131n\u0131n do\u011fum tarihinde anne…’n\u0131n resmi bir evlilik kayd\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, …’\u0131n 13.07.1999 tarihinde \u00f6ld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131na g\u00f6re davac\u0131n\u0131n, …’\u0131n cenazesinde ger\u00e7ek babas\u0131n\u0131n kim oldu\u011funu \u00f6\u011frendi\u011fi, davac\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7ek durumunu \u00f6\u011frenme tarihi ve ergin oldu\u011fu tarih dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda yasada \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcrenin ge\u00e7mi\u015f oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen bu duruma g\u00f6re; dava, soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n reddi de\u011fil, T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanununun 294. maddesine dayanan sonradan evlenmeyle kurulan soyba\u011f\u0131na itiraz, birle\u015fen dava ise babal\u0131\u011f\u0131n tespiti niteli\u011findedir. Davac\u0131 ile daval\u0131 … aras\u0131ndaki soyba\u011f\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n annesi… ile daval\u0131 …’\u0131n sonradan evlenmesiyle kurulmu\u015f olup, bu \u015fekilde kurulan soyba\u011f\u0131na itiraz davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in yasada \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcre ge\u00e7mi\u015ftir. Sonradan evlenmeyle kurulan soyba\u011f\u0131 da iptal edilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u00d6yleyse yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan yasal d\u00fczenlemeler dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcrenin ge\u00e7mi\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle sonradan evlenmeyle kurulan soyba\u011f\u0131na itiraz davas\u0131n\u0131n reddine, \u00e7ocuk ile ba\u015fka bir erkek aras\u0131nda soyba\u011f\u0131 ili\u015fkisi varsa babal\u0131k davas\u0131 dinlenemeyece\u011fi ve n\u00fcfusta kayden baba olarak g\u00f6r\u00fcnen daval\u0131 … ile davac\u0131 aras\u0131ndaki soyba\u011f\u0131 ili\u015fkisi ortadan kalkmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda babal\u0131k davas\u0131n\u0131n \u015fartlar\u0131 da olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bu davan\u0131n da reddine karar verilmesi gerekirken yerinde olmayan gerek\u00e7e ile davalar\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir. Bu itibarla, yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenler g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde tutulmaks\u0131z\u0131n yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi yerinde bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan h\u00fckm\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131 gerekmi\u015ftir. SONU\u00c7: Daval\u0131n\u0131n temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde oldu\u011fundan kabul\u00fcne, yukar\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 nedenlerden dolay\u0131 6217 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunla 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanununa eklenen Ge\u00e7ici 3. maddesindeki at\u0131f nedeniyle 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanununun 428. maddesi gere\u011fince h\u00fckm\u00fcn BOZULMASINA, temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde temyiz edene iadesine, 16.12.2013 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n MAHKEMES\u0130: <\/strong>\u0130\u015f Mahkemesi<\/p>\n\n\n\n Davac\u0131, Kurum taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6l\u00fcm ayl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan kesinti yap\u0131larak evlilik d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u00e7ocuklara \u00f6denmesi i\u015fleminin iptaline, yap\u0131lan kesintilerin \u00f6denmesi gerekti\u011finin tespitine karar verilmesini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Mahkeme, ilam\u0131nda belirtildi\u011fi \u015fekilde, iste\u011fin reddine karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n H\u00fckm\u00fcn, davac\u0131lar vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine temyiz iste\u011finin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131ktan ve Tetkik Hakimi … taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen raporla dosyadaki ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunduktan sonra i\u015fin gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc ve a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki karar tesbit edildi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n KARAR<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara, h\u00fckm\u00fcn Dairemizce de benimsenmi\u015f bulunan yasal ve hukuksal gerek\u00e7eleriyle dayana\u011f\u0131 maddi delillere ve \u00f6zellikle bu delillerin takdirinde bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemesine g\u00f6re, davac\u0131 vekilinin yerinde bulunmayan b\u00fct\u00fcn temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddiyle usul ve kanuna uygun olan h\u00fckm\u00fcn ONANMASINA, a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n temyiz edenlere y\u00fckletilmesine, 04\/04\/2013 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oy\u00e7oklu\u011fuyla karar verildi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n KAR\u015eI OY<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Davac\u0131lar vekili, sigortal\u0131 … resmi evlili\u011finden d\u00fcnyaya gelen m\u00fcvekkillerine \u00f6l\u00fcm ayl\u0131\u011f\u0131 %25 oran\u0131nda \u00f6denirken, evlilik d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u00e7ocuklar\u0131na %50 oran\u0131nda \u00f6dendi\u011fini iddia ile Kurum i\u015fleminin d\u00fczeltilmesiyle eksik \u00f6denen miktar\u0131n tahsilini dava etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Daval\u0131 Kurum, davan\u0131n reddini talep etmi\u015f, Mahkemece davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u0130htilaf, 506 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa’n\u0131n 68 nci maddesinin yorumundan kaynaklanmaktad\u0131r. S\u00f6z konusu maddenin 1\/A bendinde \u00f6len sigortal\u0131n\u0131n tespit edilecek ayl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan dul e\u015fe %50, ayl\u0131k alan \u00e7ocu\u011fu bulunmayan dul e\u015fe %75 oran\u0131nda, 1\/C bendinin a f\u0131kras\u0131nda belirtilen \u015fartlar\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yan \u00e7ocuklar\u0131na %25 oran\u0131nda, 1\/C bendinin b f\u0131rkas\u0131nda ise, a f\u0131kras\u0131nda belirtilen ve sigortal\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc ile anas\u0131z ve babas\u0131z kalan veya sonradan bu duruma d\u00fc\u015fenler ile ana ve babalar\u0131 aras\u0131nda evlilik ba\u011flant\u0131s\u0131 bulunmayan, yahut sigortal\u0131 baban\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm tarihinde evlilik ba\u011flant\u0131s\u0131 bulunmakla beraber, analar\u0131 sonradan evlenenlerin her birine %50 oran\u0131nda ayl\u0131k ba\u011flanaca\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015f, ayn\u0131 maddenin 2 nci bendinde ise, sigortal\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan evlat edinilmi\u015f, tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015f veya nesebi d\u00fczeltilmi\u015f, yahut babal\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00fckme ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015f \u00e7ocuklar ile sigortal\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnden sonra do\u011fan \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n ba\u011flanacak ayl\u0131ktan yukar\u0131da belirtilen esaslara g\u00f6re yararlanabilecekleri h\u00fckme ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Maddenin 1\/A bendinin e\u015fe, 1\/C bendinin a ve b f\u0131kralar\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7ocuklar\u0131na ba\u011flanacak ayl\u0131k oranlar\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fczenledi\u011fi, 1\/C bendinin a f\u0131kras\u0131nda sigortal\u0131n\u0131n hayatta bulunan e\u015fi ile birlikte bulunan \u00e7ocuklara ba\u011flanacak ayl\u0131k oranlar\u0131 belirlenirken, b f\u0131kras\u0131nda ise sigortal\u0131dan ayl\u0131k alacak e\u015fin bulunmamas\u0131 durumunda \u00e7ocuklara ba\u011flanacak ayl\u0131k oran\u0131n\u0131n belirlendi\u011fi yasa metninden a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Ayl\u0131ktan pay alan dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n sigortal\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan tan\u0131nmak suretiyle, n\u00fcfus kayd\u0131na ge\u00e7irildi\u011fi ve Kurumca evlilik i\u00e7inde do\u011fan davac\u0131lara %25 oran\u0131nda ayl\u0131k ba\u011flan\u0131rken, tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015f \u00e7ocuklara %50 oran\u0131nda ayl\u0131k ba\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. 68\/1-C bendinin b f\u0131kras\u0131nda ana ve babalar\u0131 aras\u0131nda evlilik ba\u011f\u0131 bulunmayan \u00e7ocuklar i\u00e7in %50 oran\u0131nda ayl\u0131k ba\u011flanaca\u011f\u0131 belirtilmekte ise de, bu f\u0131krada e\u015fin ayl\u0131\u011fa i\u015ftirak etmeme durumu s\u00f6z konusu oldu\u011fundan, bu \u00e7ocuklarla evlilik i\u00e7inde do\u011fan \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n ayl\u0131k ba\u011flama oran\u0131 %50 oran\u0131nda tespit olunmu\u015ftur. Yasa koyucu evlilik i\u00e7inde do\u011fan \u00e7ocuklarla, tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015f \u00e7ocuklar aras\u0131nda ba\u011flanacak ayl\u0131k oran\u0131nda bir farkl\u0131l\u0131k yaratmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Sigortal\u0131n\u0131n e\u015fi hayatta oldu\u011funa g\u00f6re ve 68 nci maddenin 2 nci bendi h\u00fckm\u00fc de g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde tutularak, gerek evlilik i\u00e7inde do\u011fan \u00e7ocuklara gerekse tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015f \u00e7ocuklara 506 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa’n\u0131n 68 nci maddesinin 1\/C bendinin a f\u0131kras\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fc uyar\u0131nca, %25 oran\u0131nda ayl\u0131k ba\u011flanmas\u0131 gerekmektedir.Yasa metni a\u00e7\u0131k oldu\u011fu gibi, mirastan e\u015fit pay alan \u00e7ocuklar aras\u0131nda ba\u011flanacak yetim ayl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n farkl\u0131 oranlarda uygulanmas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a kanunun ruhuna da ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r.Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131\u011f\u0131m nedenlerle, karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcmden, \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011fun g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne i\u015ftirak etmemekteyim.<\/p>\n\n\n\n MAHKEMES\u0130:<\/strong> Aile Mahkemesi<\/p>\n\n\n\n Dava dilek\u00e7esinde, k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck …’n\u0131n ger\u00e7ek anne ve babas\u0131n\u0131n … ve … oldu\u011funun tespiti ile n\u00fcfus kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n buna g\u00f6re d\u00fczeltilmesi istenilmi\u015ftir. Mahkemece davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015f, h\u00fck\u00fcm davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n YARGITAY KARARI<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Temyiz isteminin s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra dosyadaki b\u00fct\u00fcn ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunup gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Davac\u0131 …, dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 … ile evliyken, … ile evlilik d\u0131\u015f\u0131 ili\u015fkisinden 29.04.2004 tarihinde k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck …\u2019n\u0131n do\u011fdu\u011funu; bu \u00e7ocu\u011fun daval\u0131lar … ve e\u015fi …’in hanelerine onlar\u0131n evlilikleri i\u00e7inde do\u011fmu\u015f \u00e7ocuklar\u0131ym\u0131\u015f gibi kaydedildi\u011fini, k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck …’n\u0131n, ger\u00e7ekte kendi k\u0131z\u0131 oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrerek, …’n\u0131n, … ve … k\u0131z\u0131 oldu\u011funun tespiti ile … ve …’in \u00fczerindeki kayd\u0131n\u0131n iptaline; …’\u0131n \u00e7ocu\u011fun babas\u0131 olmas\u0131 nedeniyle bu ki\u015finin n\u00fcfusuna tesciline karar verilmesini istemi\u015f; mahkemece; k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn … ve e\u015fi …’in \u00fczerindeki kayd\u0131n\u0131n iptaline ili\u015fkin talep, ” bu ki\u015filerle \u00e7ocuk aras\u0131ndaki soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131” olarak nitelendirilmi\u015f, “bu davan\u0131n baba ve \u00e7ocuk taraf\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131labilece\u011fi, annenin soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 davas\u0131 a\u00e7ma hakk\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131\u201d gerek\u00e7esiyle; \u00e7ocu\u011fun babas\u0131n\u0131n … oldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin talep ise, ”babal\u0131k” olarak nitelendirilmi\u015f, “anan\u0131n dava hakk\u0131n\u0131n do\u011fumdan ba\u015flayarak bir y\u0131l ge\u00e7mekle d\u00fc\u015fece\u011fi (TMK. m. 303\/1), bu s\u00fcrenin ge\u00e7ti\u011fi” gerek\u00e7esiyle dava t\u00fcm\u00fcyle reddedilmi\u015f; karar\u0131 davac\u0131 temyiz etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Dava, \u00e7ocu\u011fun anas\u0131 oldu\u011funu iddia eden … taraf\u0131ndan, … ve … ile, \u00e7ocu\u011fun babas\u0131 oldu\u011fu iddia edilen …’\u0131n (bu ki\u015finin 2009 tarihinde \u00f6lm\u00fc\u015f olmas\u0131 sebebiyle) miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131na ve n\u00fcfus idaresine kar\u015f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Dosyaya al\u0131nan kay\u0131tlara g\u00f6re k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck …, 29.04.2004 do\u011fumlu olup, halen daval\u0131lar … ve e\u015fi …’in \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 olarak onlar\u0131n \u00fczerinde kay\u0131tl\u0131d\u0131r. Davac\u0131 …, …’n\u0131n kendi \u00e7ocu\u011fu oldu\u011funu, dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u0130brahim ile evliyken, … ile evlilik d\u0131\u015f\u0131 ili\u015fkisinden d\u00fcnyaya geldi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrmektedir. Daval\u0131lar … ve e\u015fi …; duru\u015fmadaki beyanlar\u0131nda “k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck … isimli \u00e7ocu\u011fun, davac\u0131 …’n\u0131n … ile evlilik d\u0131\u015f\u0131 ili\u015fkisinden do\u011fdu\u011funu, … o tarihte evli oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in, evlilik d\u0131\u015f\u0131 ili\u015fkisinden d\u00fcnyaya gelen bu \u00e7ocu\u011fu n\u00fcfusa kaydettiremedi\u011fini, \u00e7ocu\u011fun ma\u011fdur olmamas\u0131 i\u00e7in kendi \u00e7ocuklar\u0131ym\u0131\u015f gibi ger\u00e7e\u011fe ayk\u0131r\u0131 beyanla \u00fczerlerine kaydettirdiklerini, \u00e7ocu\u011fun kendi \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131” kabul etmi\u015flerdir. Daval\u0131lar … ve …’in bu beyanlar\u0131na g\u00f6re, dava iki y\u00f6nl\u00fcd\u00fcr. Birincisi; k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck …’n\u0131n daval\u0131lar … ve …’in \u00fczerindeki kayd\u0131n\u0131n, ger\u00e7e\u011fe ayk\u0131r\u0131 beyanla olu\u015ftu\u011fu iddias\u0131na dayanan n\u00fcfus kayd\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczeltilmesi; \u0130kincisi ise, \u00e7ocu\u011fun babas\u0131n\u0131n … oldu\u011funun tespiti ile …in n\u00fcfusuna tescili iste\u011fidir. K\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck …’n\u0131n, … ve …\u2019in \u00fczerindeki kayd\u0131 iptal edilmedik\u00e7e, babal\u0131\u011fa ili\u015fkin ikinci iste\u011fin incelenmesi hukuken m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. \u00d6yleyse, bu talepler ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 incelenmeli ve sonuca ba\u011flanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Mahkemece, bu talepler ayr\u0131lmadan dava b\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcyle reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 1-\u00c7ocuk halen daval\u0131lar … ve e\u015fi …’\u0131n evlili\u011finden do\u011fmu\u015f gibi, bu adlar\u0131 ge\u00e7enlerin \u00fczerinde kay\u0131tl\u0131d\u0131r. Buradaki kay\u0131t iptal edildi\u011finde, annesi …’\u0131n, dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u0130brahim ile evlilikleri i\u00e7inde do\u011fmu\u015f olacak, T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanununun 285’nci maddesinde yer alan h\u00fck\u00fcm gere\u011fince, \u00e7ocukla …’n\u0131n kocas\u0131 dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u0130brahim aras\u0131nda soyba\u011f\u0131 kendili\u011finden kurulmu\u015f olacakt\u0131r. Bu soyba\u011f\u0131 \u00e7\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmedik\u00e7e, \u00e7ocu\u011fun babas\u0131n\u0131n … oldu\u011funa karar verilemeyecektir. Kanuna g\u00f6re, \u00e7ocuk ile bir ba\u015fka erkek aras\u0131nda soyba\u011f\u0131 ili\u015fkisi varsa, bir y\u0131ll\u0131k hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcre bu ili\u015fkinin ortadan kalkt\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihten itibaren i\u015flemeye ba\u015flar (TMK. m. 303\/3). Bu bak\u0131mdan, \u00e7ocu\u011fun anas\u0131n\u0131n … oldu\u011fu h\u00fckmen belirlendikten ve \u00e7ocukla dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u0130brahim aras\u0131ndaki T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunun 285. maddesi gere\u011fi kendili\u011finden olu\u015facak olan soyba\u011f\u0131 ili\u015fkisi ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra anan\u0131n babal\u0131k davas\u0131 a\u00e7ma hakk\u0131 do\u011fmu\u015f olaca\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re, davan\u0131n babal\u0131\u011fa ili\u015fkin y\u00f6n\u00fcn\u00fcn, bu a\u015famada “hak du\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcrenin ge\u00e7mi\u015f bulundu\u011fu” gerek\u00e7esiyle reddedilmesi do\u011fru de\u011fil ise de, verilen ret karar\u0131, a\u00e7\u0131klanan sebeple anan\u0131n dava hakk\u0131 hen\u00fcz do\u011fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan babal\u0131k bak\u0131m\u0131ndan sonucu itibar\u0131yla do\u011fru bulundu\u011fundan, davan\u0131n reddi karar\u0131n\u0131n bu y\u00f6nden ONANMASINA,<\/p>\n\n\n\n 2-Davac\u0131, daval\u0131lar … ve …’\u0131n \u00fczerinde kay\u0131tl\u0131 bulunan 29.04.2004 do\u011fumlu k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck …\u2019n\u0131n kendi \u00e7ocu\u011fu oldu\u011funu, bu \u00e7ocu\u011fun di\u011fer daval\u0131lar\u0131n miras b\u0131rakan\u0131 … ile evlilik d\u0131\u015f\u0131 ili\u015fkisinden d\u00fcnyaya geldi\u011fini, o tarihte dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u0130brahim ile evli oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in \u00e7ocu\u011fu n\u00fcfusa kaydettiremedi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrmektedir. Daval\u0131lar … ve … de, bu \u00e7ocu\u011fun kendilerinden olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kabul etmektedirler. Ba\u015fkas\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7ocu\u011funun, daval\u0131lar … ve e\u015fi … taraf\u0131ndan kendi \u00e7ocuklar\u0131ym\u0131\u015f gibi ger\u00e7e\u011fe ayk\u0131r\u0131 beyanla n\u00fcfusa tescil ettirmeleri halinde, bu ki\u015filer ile \u00e7ocuk aras\u0131nda bir soyba\u011f\u0131 ili\u015fkisi kurulmu\u015f olmaz. B\u00f6yle bir durumda resmi sicilin ba\u015ftan hatal\u0131 olu\u015fturulmas\u0131 s\u00f6z konusudur. Resmi sicilin i\u00e7eri\u011finin do\u011fru olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ispat\u0131 kanunlarda ba\u015fka bir h\u00fck\u00fcm bulunmad\u0131k\u00e7a herhangi bir \u015fekle tabi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 (TMK. m. 7\/2) gibi, bunun d\u00fczeltilmesi de herhangi bir hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcreye ba\u011fl\u0131 de\u011fildir. Dava sonucunda, \u00e7ocu\u011fun halen kay\u0131tl\u0131 oldu\u011fu haneden \u00e7\u0131k\u0131p, ba\u015fka bir haneye kaydedilecek olmas\u0131, di\u011fer bir ifade ile hane de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi de davay\u0131 “soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n reddi” haline getirmez. Bu bak\u0131mdan, k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck …’n\u0131n, daval\u0131lar … ve e\u015fi …\u2019in \u00fczerindeki kayd\u0131n\u0131n iptali iste\u011fi, soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n reddi olmay\u0131p, ger\u00e7e\u011fe ayk\u0131r\u0131 beyanla olu\u015fturulan ki\u015fisel durum sicilinin d\u00fczeltilmesi niteli\u011findedir. 4787 say\u0131l\u0131 Aile Mahkemelerinin Kurulu\u015f, G\u00f6rev ve Yarg\u0131lama Usullerine Dair Kanunun 4\/1. maddesi uyar\u0131nca, aile mahkemeleri, 4721 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanununun \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc k\u0131sm\u0131 hari\u00e7 ikinci kitab\u0131nda (m. 118-395) yer alan aile hukukundan do\u011fan dava ve i\u015flerde g\u00f6revli olup; ki\u015fisel durum sicilinin d\u00fczeltilmesi davalar\u0131 bu mahkemelerin g\u00f6revi kapsam\u0131nda de\u011fil, 5490 say\u0131l\u0131 N\u00fcfus Hizmetleri Kanununun 36\u2019nci maddesi gere\u011fince asliye hukuk mahkemesinin g\u00f6revi dahilindedir. \u00c7ocu\u011fun, daval\u0131lar … ve …’in \u00e7ocu\u011fu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, annesinin davac\u0131 … oldu\u011funun tespiti halinde, do\u011fum tarihinde … dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u0130brahim ile evli oldu\u011funa g\u00f6re, mevcut kayd\u0131n\u0131n iptali durumunda kanunen …’n\u0131n evlilik hanesine tescil edilece\u011fi, d\u00fczeltmenin bu \u015fekilde olaca\u011f\u0131 tabidir. O halde, davan\u0131n bu b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc bak\u0131m\u0131ndan, asliye hukuk mahkemesinin g\u00f6revli oldu\u011fu nazara al\u0131narak, g\u00f6revsizlik karar\u0131 verilmesi gerekirken, bu y\u00f6n nazara al\u0131nmadan i\u015fin esas\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesi do\u011fru bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Bu itibarla yukar\u0131da (2.) bentte a\u00e7\u0131k\u0131lanan esaslar g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcnde tutulmaks\u0131z\u0131n yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi isabetsiz, temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu sebeple yerinde oldu\u011fundan kabul\u00fc ile h\u00fckm\u00fcn yukar\u0131da (2.) bentte g\u00f6sterilen sebeple Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanununun 428’nci maddesi gere\u011fince BOZULMASINA, temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde temyiz edene iadesine, i\u015fbu karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren onbe\u015f g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere, 25.04.2016 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Soyba\u011f\u0131 kurulduktan sonra evet; anne taraf\u0131ndan do\u011fumla, baba taraf\u0131ndan tan\u0131ma veya mahkeme karar\u0131yla tam miras\u00e7\u0131 olur.<\/p>\n\n\n\n DNA testi ve delil toplama s\u00fcresiyle birlikte ortalama 1-2 y\u0131l; istinaf ve temyiz a\u015famalar\u0131 uzatabilir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Hay\u0131r; sakl\u0131 pay\u0131 (yasal miras pay\u0131n\u0131n yar\u0131s\u0131) korunur. A\u015f\u0131r\u0131 tasarruf tenkis davas\u0131yla azalt\u0131labilir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Miras\u0131n iptali ve yeniden payla\u015f\u0131m\u0131 davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131labilir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Babal\u0131k karar\u0131 veya tan\u0131ma ile n\u00fcfus m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ba\u015fvurulur; gerekirse mahkeme yolu izlenir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Evlilik d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u00e7ocu\u011fun miras hakk\u0131, soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kurulmas\u0131yla tam ve e\u015fit hale gelir. Bu s\u00fcre\u00e7, zaman a\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcreleri, delil toplama ve mahkeme usulleri nedeniyle karma\u015f\u0131k olabilir. Hak kayb\u0131 ya\u015famamak i\u00e7in erken hukuki dan\u0131\u015fmanl\u0131k \u015fartt\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 6NOVA Avukatl\u0131k B\u00fcrosu olarak, aile hukuku ve miras hukuku alan\u0131nda uzman avukatlar\u0131m\u0131zla soyba\u011f\u0131 tespiti, babal\u0131k davas\u0131, miras pay\u0131 talebi ve n\u00fcfus kayd\u0131 d\u00fczeltme davalar\u0131n\u0131zda yan\u0131n\u0131zday\u0131z. \u0130stanbul merkezli b\u00fcromuz, g\u00fcncel Yarg\u0131tay i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131 ve mevzuat de\u011fi\u015fikliklerini yak\u0131ndan takip ederek m\u00fcvekkillerine profesyonel \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm sunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Detayl\u0131 bilgi ve randevu i\u00e7in 6NOVA Avukatl\u0131k B\u00fcrosu ile ileti\u015fime ge\u00e7ebilirsiniz. Miras ve soyba\u011f\u0131 konular\u0131nda haklar\u0131n\u0131z\u0131 en etkili \u015fekilde koruman\u0131z i\u00e7in buraday\u0131z.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu (TMK), evlilik d\u0131\u015f\u0131 do\u011fan \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n miras haklar\u0131n\u0131 net ve e\u015fitlik\u00e7i bir yakla\u015f\u0131mla d\u00fczenlemektedir. Anne taraf\u0131ndan soyba\u011f\u0131 do\u011fumla kuruldu\u011fu i\u00e7in evlilik d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u00e7ocuklar, annenin miras\u0131nda evlilik i\u00e7i \u00e7ocuklarla tamamen ayn\u0131 haklara sahiptir. Baba taraf\u0131ndan ise miras hakk\u0131, soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tan\u0131ma veya h\u00e2kim h\u00fckm\u00fcyle kurulmas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. Soyba\u011f\u0131 kurulduktan sonra evlilik d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u00e7ocuk, baba y\u00f6n\u00fcnden de […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1438,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2,16],"tags":[95,96],"class_list":["post-1437","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-makaleler","category-miras-hukuku","tag-evlilik-disi-cocugun-miras-hakki","tag-evlilik-disi-cocuk-miras"],"blocksy_meta":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/altinova.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1437","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/altinova.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/altinova.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/altinova.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/altinova.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1437"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/altinova.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1437\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1439,"href":"https:\/\/altinova.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1437\/revisions\/1439"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/altinova.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1438"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/altinova.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1437"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/altinova.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1437"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/altinova.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1437"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}Yarg\u0131tay (Kapat\u0131lan) 18. Hukuk Dairesi 2013\/18452 E. 2013\/17908 K.<\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Yarg\u0131tay (Kapat\u0131lan) 21. Hukuk Dairesi 2012\/1356 E. 2013\/6756 K.<\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Yarg\u0131tay 18. Hukuk Dairesi 2015\/9865 E. 2016\/6624 K.<\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Frequently Asked Questions<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Evlilik d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u00e7ocuk mirastan pay al\u0131r m\u0131?<\/strong><\/h6>\n\n\n\n
Babal\u0131k davas\u0131 ne kadar s\u00fcrer?<\/strong><\/h6>\n\n\n\n
Vasiyetname ile evlilik d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u00e7ocuk mirastan mahrum edilebilir mi?<\/strong><\/h6>\n\n\n\n
Miras payla\u015f\u0131m\u0131 yap\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra soyba\u011f\u0131 kurulursa ne olur?<\/strong><\/h6>\n\n\n\n
N\u00fcfus kayd\u0131 nas\u0131l d\u00fczeltilir?<\/strong><\/h6>\n\n\n\n
Sonu\u00e7<\/h3>\n\n\n\n